This morning I received the AMMA Monitor, the magazine of our American friends. The main article : "Who is an Amateur and Who is a professional ?". It has been written by Walt Gilmore, the AMMA-President. In fact it is an everlasting discussion, but Walt's last sentences are very essential. He writes :Dave Watterson wrote:
So what does it cost to make a film?
Some people will swear it costs almost nothing. Go on holiday, shoot footage, edit it and add music. Film.
Others will speak of travel expenses, catering, prop and costume hire, crane hire, generator hire and so on.
Dave
"All in all, it is not the cost, rich production values or scope of the video which is important (although these things can influence the audience and/or judges); it should be the story and the creative telling that ultimately prove which is the "Best Picture".
Good article, Walt.
Maybe you already know that Peter Rouillard and I myself are making a film about the Bailick of Guernsey. I've just come home. Guernsey was wonderful. Herm and Sark were breathtaking. Good stuff for the film. Wonderful photography thanks to the weather. The palm trees were glowing in the sunshine... I had to walk and walk up and down with my tripod. It was heavy in the muggy weather. Peter and I met our actress again. We still needed a shot of her. We talked about the production process. It was very useful/interesting that we met again. Is not simple to make an internationally made film. Of course this is not a film for the Guernsey competition. For BIAFF OK, or for AMPS, etc...
Now I wonder ... Imagine that Peter and I are selling the long version of the film in order to raise funds or to support the organisation of the the Guernsey Lily Competition. The more money you have the more you can spoil your friends who enter their films and who attend our most friendly competition in the world. Would that be wrong ? I don't think so.