Judging the IAC competition
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 8:48 am
In an earlier posting Ken Wilson said: "My real worry though is this idea
of judging the whole competition
in ONE single weekend. fatigue is bound to be a factor and how can the judges
be fair and objective if they are exhausted. I know finance is a consideration
with hotel room hire, but I think that this policy should be re-thought before
next time!!"
Nothing has changed in the way the competition was judged which would make
the judges any more or less tired.
The working hours of the judges have not changed.
Going back a few years one group of preliminary judging teams sorted out
the gradings: blue - silver on one weekend. On a later weekend another group
of judging teams went through the silvers and sorted out the golds. Then
on a later weekend the final panel met to view all the golds and award specific
prizes.
This year the preliminary teams did all the grading from blue - gold in one
go. The final panel began their work 2 hours after the others and ended
2 hours after them. That meant that as the prelim teams sifted out golds
they could be passed along to the final panel.
There is a feeling that the rankings were more erratic than usual. Maybe,
it is always difficult to quantify that. If so that is because there were
a number of new judges finding their feet - you always need fresh blood -
and the prelim panels had to consider the whole gamut from blue to gold each
time.
So the single weekend operation was not in itself a problem.
Dave W
of judging the whole competition
in ONE single weekend. fatigue is bound to be a factor and how can the judges
be fair and objective if they are exhausted. I know finance is a consideration
with hotel room hire, but I think that this policy should be re-thought before
next time!!"
Nothing has changed in the way the competition was judged which would make
the judges any more or less tired.
The working hours of the judges have not changed.
Going back a few years one group of preliminary judging teams sorted out
the gradings: blue - silver on one weekend. On a later weekend another group
of judging teams went through the silvers and sorted out the golds. Then
on a later weekend the final panel met to view all the golds and award specific
prizes.
This year the preliminary teams did all the grading from blue - gold in one
go. The final panel began their work 2 hours after the others and ended
2 hours after them. That meant that as the prelim teams sifted out golds
they could be passed along to the final panel.
There is a feeling that the rankings were more erratic than usual. Maybe,
it is always difficult to quantify that. If so that is because there were
a number of new judges finding their feet - you always need fresh blood -
and the prelim panels had to consider the whole gamut from blue to gold each
time.
So the single weekend operation was not in itself a problem.
Dave W